Recent Articles

Follow Us
  >  

In last week’s blog post I talked about how many people are alone without apparent family and that dying alone - from an estate administration perspective - raises issues such as identifying the rightful heirs. For people that don’t have close relationships, they probably have less reason to think about executing a will.  As I explained last week, state intestacy laws step in when there is no will.  Often, although not always, some people who had some contact with the decedent step forward or are easily identified.  This does not, however, tell us about any other heirs we may not know about. When we work on an estate administration matter, the heirs typically get impatient about the process.  “Why does it take so long”, they ask.  There are actually a number of reasons why. Let’s start with the fact that any administrator must be appointed, either by the County Surrogate, the elected official charged with overseeing the estate administration process, or a judge in cases where there is no spouse or child with first right to serve as administrator under the law.  When a judge is needed, the process takes a bit longer - 6 week or longer depending on the court’s scheduling. Once an administrator is appointed, he or

There have been a number of stories in the media about an epidemic of loneliness among the elderly. This is in part because families are smaller and more spread out.  From an estate administration perspective, this means that many of these same people are dying alone and without apparent or at least known heirs. When someone dies without a will, state intestacy laws establish the line of heirs who are entitled to receive estate assets and in what order.  Spouses, children and other direct descendants take first.  When there are no such heirs, more remote family members such as siblings, nieces and nephews and cousins are next in line. The more remote the family, however, the more difficult it becomes to identify these heirs.     Some of them may have lost touch with the decedent (person who died) and are not even aware of the death.  In some cases, family members may step forward, claiming to be heirs.  But, how can we be sure and even if true, how can we be sure that there aren’t other heirs we don’t know about who haven’t reached out?  Aren’t they entitled to a share the estate? What happens if it turns out that there are no heirs? Next week I’ll

In my last 2 weeks’ blog posts I have been discussing the issues related to leaving your assets to beneficiaries who are not U.S. citizens.  This week I want to cover a couple of recent scenarios in our office.  One involved a decedent who was a U.S. citizen, died without a will and left a husband and minor son in Africa and a daughter in the U.S.  To further complicate the matter, the husband also had children not of his relationship with his wife. Under New Jersey intestacy laws, because the husband had other children, he is to receive only a part of the estate, not all of it.  The balance goes to the decedent’s children.  Adding to this complication is the fact that the son is a minor so cannot legally receive his share.  The share of a minor typically is held in trust or possibly deposited with the Surrogate until he reaches age 18.  Being a foreign national further complicates and delays the process. In another case, the decedent had a will which left part of her estate to her sibling, a resident of Hungary.  The sibling survived the decedent but then died before receiving his distribution.  The sibling had no will.  Not knowing how the estate administration process there

In my post last week, I answered the question whether leaving assets to a non-U.S. citizen triggers any additional tax when compared to a U.S. beneficiary.  With the exception of a spouse, it generally makes no difference from an estate or inheritance tax standpoint.  There are, however, other practical considerations to take into account. For example, before an executor or administrator distributes the estate to the heirs, he or she should prepare an accounting showing what was taken into the estate, what was paid in estate debts and taxes and what each heir’s share of the remaining estate is.  It is a good practice - for the fiduciary’s protection - that each heir sign a release and refunding bond which releases the fiduciary from any liability before funds are distributed. While it is recommended that these documents be signed before a notary, that can sometimes be problematic logistically if the heir lives in a remote area not near the U.S. embassy or consulate or where a notary can easily be found.  While this certainly isn’t a reason to change one’s chosen heirs, it can lead to some delays or necessitate work arounds to insure that all documents are properly signed and acknowledged. Additionally, there may be tax

In some respects, naming a non-U.S. citizen as a beneficiary of your estate is no different than naming a U.S. citizen (with the exception of a spouse).  For example, while the amount that can be passed free of federal estate tax (there currently is no New Jersey estate tax) is currently $13.61 million, this applies only to the estates of U.S. citizens.  The amount that can be passed tax free by a non-U.S. citizen is $60,000. It is the citizenship of the decedent and not that the beneficiary that matters. The spouse is the exception because there is no marital deduction available to the non-U.S. citizen spouse.  The marital deduction provides that spouses can pass unlimited amounts to each other - even if they exceed the exemption amount ($13.61 million in 2024).  This unlimited exemption is not, however, available for transfers by a U.S. citizen spouse to a non-U.S. citizen spouse.  Estate tax on transfers can only be avoided by setting up a specific type of a trust known as a qualified domestic trust (QDOT).  Additionally, lifetime transfers to a non-U.S. citizen spouse are limited to an annual exclusion of $185,000 (for 2024) before being subject to gift tax. While New Jersey phased out its estate tax in

In this 4th post of 4, I continue to discuss the topic of a catastrophic illness or injury hitting a younger family.  We discussed the issues of long term care which may be needed for extended periods of time or for life.  Advances in medical science can save lives but a lot of care is often needed.  But, as I stated last week, many of these patients may ultimately not survive.  So what happens if someone in their 30’s, 40’s or 50’s dies without a will? As I have written about in past blog posts, without a will the intestacy laws determine who inherits.  Most people would assume that a surviving spouse will be first in line to receive all the assets, however, that isn’t always the case.  If either the decedent (person who died) or the surviving spouse has children from other relationships, then the spouse will inherit a part of the estate but the balance will go to the children. That’s where it can get complicated.  If any of the children are minors, then their inheritance may need to be deposited into court until age 18. At that age, although legally an adult, most people do not have the knowledge, experience and wisdom to handle what could