A Simple Estate Matter? Not so Fast (Part 2)
Last week I was telling you about Mark’s call regarding the administration of his sister, Melanie’s estate. He had gone to the Surrogate to get appointed as administrator of the estate but had listed only 4 of 5 siblings as heirs, thinking his brother, Frank should not be listed because he “can’t” receive a share. What he really meant was that he can’t receive that share without losing his government benefits, including Medicaid. However, I explained to Mark that legally Frank was entitled to a share because Melanie didn’t leave a will. Intestacy laws establish that because she wasn’t married, didn’t have children and both her parents had already died, the next in line to receive her estate are her siblings. Mark was correct that Frank’s receipt of his share would jeopardize his benefits and could result in his losing his housing in a group home he has been living in all his adult life. I told Mark what we need to do is establish a special needs trust #SpecialNeedsTrust for Frank’s benefit. His share of the estate could be placed in that trust as long as he is disabled and under age 65 (he is). The trust can only
A Simple Estate Matter? Not so Fast
Mark called because he needed assistance with an inheritance tax return. The attorney he had hired to assist him in selling his sister, Melanie's home was unsure how to complete it. A little bit of background is helpful. Melanie died without a will. She had never married and had no children. Accordingly, under New Jersey's intestacy laws, which determine how assets are distributed when one dies without a will, Melanie's estate next passes to her parents. However Mark told me they both died years ago. Next in line are Melanie's siblings. Mark told me he had already gone to the Surrogate to be appointed administrator. He said his 3 siblings signed renunciations as administrator in favor of him. He now just needed help filing the inheritance tax return so he could then distribute the estate to himself and his 3 siblings. I explained that the tax is calculated based on the relationship of the heirs to the person who died. But what he had said early in our conversation raised some questions which caused me to inquire further. He had said at one point that Mary had 5 siblings but later referred to his 3 siblings (plus himself would
The Problem with Annuities and How to Solve It (Part 3) #ProblemwithAnnuities
Last week I outlined for you the advantages of the Pension Protection Act (PPA), #PensionProtectionAct which became effective in 2010. The government has provided some pretty significant tax advantages as an incentive for Americans to self-fund their long term care. As a result, insurance companies have created varied products to take advantage of the law. Let’s look at some examples. Bob is 70 and has an existing IRA annuity. He looked at traditional long term care insurance and didn’t like the “use it or lose it” aspect and the uncertainty of increasing premiums in the future. If he or his wife needs long term care he intends to start drawing the money out of the annuity. By repositioning the annuity to one with a long term care rider, if either he or his wife needs long term care they’ll use the cash in the annuity but they’ll also have additional coverage under the LTC rider. Bob designates his wife as an “eligible person” for coverage. If he dies first, his wife can continue the policy for the rest of her life and get the same coverage. If he survives his wife any cash remaining in the annuity is passed
The Problem with Annuities and How to Solve It (Part 2) #Annuities
Last week I was outlining the problem with annuities. What I am specifically referring to is the tax deferred status of annuities. While the growth inside these investments is not taxed until monies are withdrawn, they are taxed as ordinary income and if left to heirs there is no step up in basis to avoid the tax like there is in the case of stocks and real estate. Often these annuities will pay out on an accelerated basis at death, causing a large tax hit. Americans own billions of dollars of deferred annuities. Less than 2% of annuity owners ever annuitize them - turn on the guaranteed income stream that is one of the primary advantages of these investments. Instead they leave these assets untouched to their heirs – with the very large tax bill that goes along with it. There is, however, a way to avoid the taxes on these assets and at the same time pay for your long term care should you need it and protect your other assets from having to be spent towards that care. That’s because Congress passed a law in 2006 that allows for the withdrawal of tax deferred growth from annuities,
The Problem with Annuities and How to Solve It
It’s an issue that we see time and again. Many of our senior clients have annuities that they purchased years ago. In its simplest form, an annuity is an insurance contract into which you can reposition a lump sum to an insurance company and in return the insurance company will provide you with a stream of income. Immediate annuities begin making payments immediately with interest. Deferred annuities, however, allow the annuity owner to turn on the payments at a point in the future. In the meantime, the original principal amount grows tax deferred. In this way, annuities provide some of the same benefits as IRAs and other retirement accounts. The investor does not pay tax on the growth until the money is withdrawn. Similar to an IRA, there is a 10% penalty for withdrawing funds before age 59 and ½ but there is no requirement that you start withdrawing funds at 70 and ½ as there is under IRA Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) rules. (I am specifically talking about annuities held in non-retirement account. IRA annuities must still comply with RMD rules.) Annuities have been a way for people to get the same advantages of tax deferred growth as those
Home Based Medicaid – A Deceiving Benefit – Part 2 #HomeBasedMedicaid
I told you last week that Jim’s dad was running out of money. Living at home with aides providing him with round the clock care, Jim was thinking that once the cash runs out he can apply for Medicaid under New Jersey’s home based Medicaid program #NewJerseyMedicaid. Jim’s plan won’t work for a few reasons. First of all, the home based Medicaid program in New Jersey does not pay for round the clock care. On average it pays for maybe 10 to 15 hours per week, occasionally more than that but certainly not the 24/7 care that his dad needs. The only place that the State will pay for all the care is in a nursing home. Secondly, Jim figured that Dad’s income of $3500 per month would be enough to cover the taxes, insurance and upkeep on the home and his food bill. Medicaid could then pay the cost of the aides. Unfortunately, it doesn’t work that way. Medicaid works like a cost share. Your income is applied to the cost of your care with the only exceptions being that some of that income can go towards your Medigap supplemental insurance and Part D premium and a small